Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04859
Original file (BC 2013 04859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-04859

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Reentry code (RE) of 2X (First Term, Second Term or Career 
Airman nonselected for reenlistment) be changed to an RE code in 
the 1 or 3 series to allow him to reenlist into military service. 


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

As a result of being charged with disorderly conduct in Jun 12 he 
received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), Unfavorable Information File 
(UIF) and a demotion in rank.  He completed all his Alcohol and 
Drug Abuse Prevention & Treatment (ADAPT) appointments and the 
necessary legal requirements to have misdemeanor dismissed.  He 
agreed to separate under the Rollback program as a faster means to 
join the Navy and was told by his superiors that he would be able 
to enlist in any other branch of service; however, the RE code he 
received bars him from reenlisting.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 13 Oct 09, the applicant commenced his enlistment in the 
Regular Air Force.

On 29 Mar 13, the applicant’s supervisor initiated an AF Form 418, 
Selective Reenlistment/Noncommissioned Officer Status 
Consideration, and nonrecommended the applicant for continued 
service.  His supervisor noted the applicant received a Letter of 
Reprimand (LOR) for drunk and disorderly conduct, urinating in 
public, and unlawful business conduct.  He received an LOR, 
Unfavorable Information File (UIF), placement on the control 
roster, and an administrative demotion.  It was further noted the 
applicant was selected to separate under the DOS Rollback program.  
The applicant acknowledged receipt and elected not to appeal 
nonselection for continued service.   



On 31 May 13, the applicant was honorably discharged and was 
credited with 3 years, 7 months and 18 days of active service.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an 
error or an injustice.  Under AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the 
USAF, commanders have selective reenlist selection or nonselection 
authority.  The Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) considers the 
service member’s Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings, 
unfavorable information from any substantiated source, the 
servicemember’s willingness to comply with Air Force standards, 
and or the servicemember’s ability, or lack thereof, to meet 
required training and duty performance levels.  The applicant 
received an LOR for drunk and disorderly conduct, urinating in 
public, and unlawful business conduct.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 6 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed..

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2013-04859 in Executive Session on 11 Sep 14, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Nov 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Jan 14.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Mar 14.




2


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04992

    Original file (BC-2012-04992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 May 2012, the applicant submitted an additional response to his denial of reenlistment and demotion action because he indicated that he just received the ROI. On 19 September 2012, by authority of the Secretary of the Air Force, his 3 August 2012 request for redress filed under Article 138 was denied as the actions taken by the command were determined to be appropriate to the circumstances. The applicant’s discharge was correctly administered on the basis of his RE code of 2X (denied...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103

    Original file (BC 2014 01103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00548

    Original file (BC-2011-00548.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00548 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (First term, second term or career Airman considered but not selected under the SRP) be changed to allow her to enlist into Air Force Reserve. ________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04879

    Original file (BC 2013 04879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04879 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code “2X” (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a “1” series. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463

    Original file (BC 2013 03463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01988

    Original file (BC 2014 01988.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any duty that requires him to report his arrest for DUI violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. On 10 Oct 12, the applicant’s commander issued him an LOR for failing to report his arrest to his security officer as required by DoD Regulation 5200.2-R, paragraph C9.1.4. On 11 Mar 13, in response to a request from the applicant, his referral EPR was amended to remove reference to the DUI, however, the EPR remained an overall “3” based upon the applicant’s failure to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00574

    Original file (BC-2010-00574.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00574 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4I (serving on the Control Roster) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. On 10 Jul 06, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), for failure to provide a proper family care plan. The applicant was discharged...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00165

    Original file (BC-2012-00165.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00165 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to 1M (Eligible to reenlist, second-term or career airmen not yet...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00461

    Original file (BC-2011-00461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00461 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4I (Serving on the Control Roster) be changed to allow him to reenlist into military service. Accordingly, if the Board is not compelled to grant the relief he seeks, his record will be administratively corrected to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03060

    Original file (BC 2014 03060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his SPD code indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding the processing of his discharge. On 28 May 14, the...